Here's the second in a series of four articles on qualitative methods. This time, we're looking at text annotation. We'll start with a quick reminder of where we've been and where we're going.
Qualitative Methods Mini-series
In response to client requests for qualitative methods we've developed a range of tools that we will share with you over the coming months. We hope that you're interested in using these approaches in your projects.
Qualitative data is typically provided as passages of semi-structured text. That text can be researched and analysed, qualitatively and quantitatively. The matrix below lists possible techniques for each approach.
| Research | Analysis | |
| Quantitative | Reverse Mail Merge | Binary Choice Statistics |
| Qualitative | Annotation | Mind-mapping |
What is Annotation?
You're probably very familiar with annotation. You do it when you read reports/ publications and make notes in the margins, highlight sentences, or stick bookmarks to the pages. Annotation is the process of "marking-up" a document according to some structure so that you have a guide for when you return to the text. Annotation then, is fundamental to information extraction and retrieval. Annotations locate text and describe why that text is of interest. Annotations are a type of meta-data - i.e. data about data.
Annotation can be performed automatically by a computer. The software needs to know what you're looking for and why (i.e. how to mark-up the text that it finds).
Uses of Annotation
Annotation brings structure to unstructured text. It allows us to:
Example of Annotation
We've recently used annotation to help the East Midlands Development Agency to interpret a body of 700+ visit reports in terms of two dozen key issues. We used annotation to speed-up the process of extracting relevant excerpts from the report narrative.
We're also researching the potential for using correlations in co-locations as an indicator of memetic convergence. In other words, we're comparing policy documents to quantify the consensus of ideas. We expect that this research will produce a methodology for quantifying Strategic Added Value (as described in the Impact Evaluation Framework for Regional Development Agencies). Our initial findings are intuitively plausible: that Regional Economic Strategies in each region are roughly "half similar", and that neighbouring agencies tend to have more in common that distant ones.